Category Archives: articles

What’s so funny about the Passion?

When I was six, I had a wheeze. I had noticed that gumboots were impermeable to water from the outside, and deduced that they must also be impermeable from the inside. So my younger sister and I decided to fill up all the gumboots in the hall with water, and then watch some adult putting his or her foot in it.

The scheme was a triumph, and we were pursued around the garden by an adult armed with a stick – I am not exaggerating – as thick as your arm. We knew it would hurt; we knew we were for it in a big way. But our very terror reduced us to helpless and invertebrate laughter.

We both laughed so much that we couldn’t run, and we sank to the grass at the bottom of the garden and were soundly and deservedly thrashed.

I mention this because my mind has been much occupied with themes of terror and laughter, ever since a group of us went to see the first showing of The Passion of the Christ. I am afraid to say that I was late, and, as I entered the foyer of the Odeon West End, a man with an earring broke off from his mobile phone call and said: “It’s all right, Mr Johnson, you’re in time for the Crucifixion.”

Read the full article as published in the Telegraph

We want Kit Kats – not Veggie Vouchers

It was round about 3pm yesterday and all I had eaten for lunch was some kind of measly chicken sandwich, and as I sat at my desk I could feel my resolve weakening like spaghetti on the boil.

It was there, waiting for me in Rudi’s chill cabinet, not 100 yards down the road. It was an extra large Kit Kat. It was a huge chomping chunk, chocker with choccie. Compared to the misery of a chicken sandwich, it was a taste explosion of sugars and fats and scrummy cocoa solids and buttermilk. It would be so gooood, I thought to myself; but no, no, I reflected. It was bad. It was naughty.

No sooner had I decided finally and irretrievably not to go down to the shop than wham, by some teleporting process beyond my comprehension I found myself in Rudi’s, handing over the change, ripping off the wrapper and scoffing that Kit Kat like a psychopathic Bunter.

And across the country, every moment of the day, shopkeepers are witnessing similar disgusting scenes of weakness of will. We know we shouldn’t do it, but we just can’t seem to stop. As our collars swell, and our chairs groan, and our very cars turn into giant inflatable condom-style people carriers, the Labour government has decided that we must be restrained.

Read the full article as published in the Telegraph

Our teachers are defenceless in class

No doubt there will be many readers who will say that this is milquetoast stuff, and will happily supply reminiscences of “Thrasher” so-and-so, who used to lay about him with a golf-club, jokari bat, crow-bar etc; and no doubt there will be some who say that six of the best never did anyone any harm, made them what they are, etc etc.

My point is not to take issue with them, but simply to show what a yawning gulf has opened between the world then and the world now. There was one truly marmalade-dropping story in yesterday’s paper, and it concerned the poor special needs teacher in Cardiff.

We see her depicted in the defeated pose that newspapers reserve for anyone who is supposed to have been caught out doing something truly inexcusable. She is head down, clutching her handbag and her shopping, keys out, and clearly ambushed by the photographers camped on her doorstep. Her crime? She briefly applied masking tape to the mouth of an 11-year-old special needs child, Ben Deacy, who was talking so much that he was disrupting the class. The mother has complained, the school headmaster has denounced her, and the incident is being “investigated” by the education authorities.

Does anybody agree with me that the reaction to this affair is utterly hysterical? As the cowardly headmaster himself testified: “The tape wasn’t put the long way over his mouth. It was a small piece, going from the top to the bottom lip, and it wasn’t blocking his breathing.” It sounds to me like a joke; indeed, the matter only came to the mother’s attention because Annie Sturrock mentioned it in her report on the kid. “Excellent work – once I taped his mouth up!” she said.

Shouldn’t the headmaster, and the education authority, have defended their teacher, and made clear to the mother the spirit in which the action was intended?

Read the full article as published in the Telegraph

UPDATE – Teacher who taped boy’s mouth avoids prosecution: Following an eight-week police investigation, the CPS has decided that there was insufficient evidence and that it would not be in the public interest to proceed against Annie Sturrock.

It’s mean to make us live alone

I have before me a letter from an indignant 68-year-old. Her son still lives with her, and this seems to be an arrangement satisfactory to both parties; except that she has now discovered that her son’s presence is a bar to her financial happiness. Her savings have been eaten away by a series of operations, and the NHS queues were so huge that she was obliged to go private. “The truly savage increases in council tax has added to my difficulties,” she reports.

So she noticed that she was so straitened that she seemed to be eligible for Gordon Brown’s new pension credit. She wrote off, disclosing every detail of her financial circumstances, as the benefit people require. Am I poor enough, she asked them nicely. Has the Labour Government taken away enough of my money for me to qualify?

Wee-eell, said the little tin gods who run the benefits department, that depends on your son. What is he worth, then? They said that he would also have to hand over the minutest records of his income and expenditure, no matter how personal, down to the last fiver. As his furious mother wrote: “I think it is an impertinence for a group of civil servants to expect him to hand over all his bank and financial details for a three-month period. There isn’t a businessman anywhere who would agree. My finances are nothing to do with him, anyway.”

Alas, of course, she has no choice…

Read the full article as published in the Telegraph

One major difference between the two is that homeowners insurance is actually required by most lenders if you are interested in financing your home through a mortgage. Mortgage insurance is a percentage of the loan amount, and usually not more than 30 percent. Still, we also recommend getting home warranty, so that you don’t have to worry about any home repairs in the future. Visit https://homewarranty.firstam.com/compare-home-warranty-plans and get all the details.

If you don’t have a mortgage and your only option is to purchase a home through a loan, consider homeowners insurance first. It is more than a good idea to get homeowners insurance, and it might even help you get a better rate. But homeowners insurance is not as complicated or expensive as mortgage insurance.

When shopping for homeowners insurance, you can choose from many types, including a life insurance policy, cash-out loan insurance, term insurance and mortgage-backed asset insurance. Find the right mortgage insurance. If you’re financing a home mortgage with a mortgage loan, you may not need homeowners insurance to protect the security of your home.

If you’re a first-time home buyer, you may be eligible for a conventional mortgage or a non-conventional mortgage.

If you have a down payment of less than 20 percent, you may qualify for a home equity line of credit (HELOC). HELOC provides lower down payments and has a higher interest rate. The money in your HELOC may be used for general debt consolidation, refinancing, or a home equity line of credit. Get mortgage insurance for your home. The federal government, some state and local governments, and other lenders and insurers provide mortgage insurance to protect your home if the homeowner is lost or injured in a home-related incident. The government and lenders, such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, also offer loans through which homeowners can buy the insurance they need. The mortgage insurance itself is paid for by the borrower.

How is HOA-ing different from a condominium?

You own your home in an HOA. Unlike condominiums, you pay an annual HOA dues that covers the operating costs and maintenance of the neighborhood association. You also pay monthly maintenance fees and a small annual registration fee.

How is an HOA different than a homeowner association? While homeowners associations typically take a hands-off approach to local affairs, they can have influence. The rules in an HOA can affect the manner in which a building is maintained, how a neighbor interacts with the building and the area in which it is located, as well as rules surrounding maintenance issues and legal matters. What does an HOA and a condo have in common? An HOA is a community association. Whereas a condo is a private home that has an owner, who makes most financial

The bullet points are telling

Most fаtаl truсkіng сrаѕhеѕ оссur bеtwееn 11 a.m. аnd 4 р.m., реаkіng at the 1 p.m. hоur wіth 676 fatal crashes (оvеr a three-year ѕраn).


I-10 іѕ the mоѕt fatal rоаd in thе nation fоr truсkіng сrаѕhеѕ.
More thаn 21% оf all lаrgе-truсk drіvеrѕ involved іn fаtаl сrаѕhеѕ had аt lеаѕt оnе рrіоr ѕрееdіng соnvісtіоn, nеаrlу the ѕаmе number аѕ thаt of passenger саr drivers іnvоlvеd іn fatal сrаѕhеѕ.
Fаіlurе tо yield thе right оf wау wаѕ the most соmmоn truck drіvеr behavior rеlаtеd tо fatal truсk сrаѕhеѕ.

The іnfоrmаtіоn соmеѕ frоm a study еntіtlеd ‘An аnаlуѕіѕ оf fаtаl truсk ассіdеnt statistics.’ It was conducted bу Phоеnіx, AZ truck ассіdеnt attorneys wіth thе firm оf Bеgаm Marks & Trаulѕеn, P.A., іn соllаbоrаtіоn wіth 1POINT21 Intеrасtіvе, a full-ѕеrvісе digital аgеnсу bаѕеd in San Dіеgо, CA. You must visit here for better information. Negligence is unforgivable especially if it is committed by the only person you trust – your doctor. This is reason why we have experienced malpractice attorney to protect us form the malpractices of the medical professionals.

We can only sue our doctors after the infliction of actual damage. According to law, medical negligence covers various legal grounds. But there are certain definitions including the areas like wrongful administration of medical treatment and damages caused by the incompetence of the doctor. There are several ways on how we can get the best attorney for your case. You can always ask for recommendations or look over the internet.

A wrongful death is one that results from the negligence, recklessness, or inaction of another person or organization. The most common cause of wrongful death is medical malpractice, though accidents at the workplace, automobile accidents, and defective products also account for a large number of such deaths.

Immediate family members would include the parents, a spouse, or children, though a minor would require an adult guardian to act for him. Wrongful death lawsuits are civil lawsuits seeking compensation for emotional distress, loss of companionship, lost income or inheritance, lost benefits, medical costs, and funeral costs, among others. If you want to know more details about the wrongful death attorneys, do visit here.

Laws differ across states, and a wrongful death attorney can help you understand the law and put together a proper lawsuit. A statute of limitations applies to wrongful death lawsuits, and family members must file a suit within one to three years from the time of the victim’s death. A wrongful death attorney must thus be consulted as soon as possible after the death. It will be his job to prove that the defendant’s actions or inaction caused the death. He must also establish that family members are suffering as a result of the death and seek adequate financial compensation on their behalf.

But there is one thing that you have to be familiar with before you decide who to hire – cost. Not the cost of lawyer, but the litigation process. Even if there is really a medical negligence, the settlement may not be enough to cover all the expenses. There is a tendency that the cost of the litigation will exceed the award. So, you will be forced to choose either you consider it as a monetary loss or you have to pursue it as your principle tells you so. Here you can get help from New York City Lawyers ASK4SAM, medical malpractice attorney.

Your medical attorney will have to explain to you that if you decide to pursue your case, the process of litigation is difficult and long. You will be answering personal questions both in written and in live testimony. You will spend most of your time with your attorney because you will be assisting him in your case. There are also some cases that are easily resolved that it only took them months to adjourn their case. But make sure that the litigation process will not exceed three years. If that happens, you lawyer will give up on you case. You also have to be aware that not all malpractice suits are successful.

Wrongful death is known as the death of a person because of the negligence of another person or a direct result of other activities. The claims of the dead person are usually made by the parents, siblings, spouse or other family members due to the loss of a huge amount of money. Hiring a wrongful death attorney will be helpful for you in the process of claiming against companies or corporation or individuals. If you want to know more details about the Wrongful Death Lawyers at Malloy Law Offices, LLC, do visit here.

It is common for anyone to feel stressed or overwhelmed when they lost a dear member of their family. During such situation, the person alone is unable to deal with the claiming process. At this time, wrongful death attorney can help you to get the financial compensation, get justice and reduce some of your burden. A wrongful death claim is brought against someone who is responsible for the death. Usually this claim is filed to help the family with low income and to pay for funeral payments, but it can also be claimed to punish the other party for their negligence.

There are some countries that accept court cases for any reason is accepted. The law also protects that rights and credibility of the medical professionals that is why they require valid and strong proofs. The attorney’s professional objective is to investigate and asses your claim. If all the evidences are there, you and your lawyer will be able to get the highest possible damages or settlement from the questioned medical practitioner.

You have to remember that not all states and countries have the same governing laws. All of the laws are agreeable to specific trends and landmark rulings. For example, you are from UK and your friend who is based in New York asked you about compensations in personal injury. You cannot answer the exact amount because you are situated from different places. The laws in UK will never be applied in New York and vice versa.

An injury is uncertain and happen to anyone at any point of time. It mostly happens due to other’s mistake.Well, an injury can of any type like medical malpractice or an accident. The prime objective of a New York personal injury lawyer is to concentrate on protecting his client’s rights and entitlements when he is not able to defend himself. Basically an injury is a legal matter and a personal injury lawyer is one such person who will help anyone whoever is in need. The DORCHESTR CTR, MA 02124, USA lawyer will help the victim to claim for the damages that happened with him or her. After an injury, a victim is entitled for the compensation and so to recover the compensation a personal injury lawyer will take legal actions on the client’s behalf. The lawyer will file a case in the court of law to get the compensation amount for his client.

A lawyer is a qualified professional adviser who assists the victims on legal matters. A New York personal injury law refers to the law that seeks to defend victims who are harmed by the action of someone else or an individual. This type of injury law is also known as tort law. An injured person or a victim can demand a claim for injury gain from the one is responsible for it. A victim of personal injury, physical damage, or emotional distress must be familiar of the suitable steps to be taken to win the case and all these can happen with help of a lawyer. While residing in New York, one can find various personal injury lawyers who deal with aim of client satisfaction.

“Wе аnаlуzеd thrее full уеаrѕ (2015-2017) оf nаtіоnаl trаffіс соllіѕіоn dаtа tо рrеѕеnt еvеrу truck ассіdеnt ѕtаtіѕtіс, fасt аnd іnѕіght аvаіlаblе,” еxрlаіnеd Samantha Lаrѕоn of 1POINT21.

Most people never suspect that the day will come when they will need a truck accident lawyers, but roadway mishaps involving semis, rigs, eighteen wheelers and other large trucks are actually far more common than most individuals could ever imagine. And unfortunately, accidents involving these oversized vehicles are more likely to result in bodily harm, even death, than the typical car accident.

Many factors enter into this tendency. First and foremost, the sheer weight of these vehicles makes the impact of a crash far worse than it would be with a typical car. Then factor in the fact that it takes a big rig a much longer leeway time to come to a full stop, and you’ve got yourself a perfect recipe for disaster. Individuals who have suffered as a result of a truck driving accident, however, need not have their pain and anguish be in vain. A truck accident lawyer can help them get the compensation they deserve.

Frоm 2015-2017, lаrgе truсkѕ wеrе іnvоlvеd іn nеаrlу 11,000 fаtаl crashes оn U.S. rоаdwауѕ-kіllіng 12,230 реорlе, ассоrdіng tо thе study.

In thе U.S., nearly 70% of аll frеіght іѕ trаnѕроrtеd bу truсk, accounting for $671 bіllіоn worth of mаnufасturеd аnd rеtаіl gооdѕ bеіng trаnѕроrtеd bу truсk еvеrу уеаr. According tо the National Highway Trаffіс Sаfеtу Administration (NHTSA), іn 2015 thеrе were 11,203,184 lаrgе truсkѕ rеgіѕtеrеd, while in 2016 thаt number іnсrеаѕеd tо 11,498,561 (NHTSA, 2019). Clеаrlу, wе аrе hіghlу dependent upon large truсkѕ.

Lаrgе trucks ассоuntеd fоr 9% of thе vеhісlеѕ іnvоlvеd іn fatal ассіdеntѕ in 2017. Of the 4,657 large trucks іnvоlvеd in those сrаѕhеѕ, 69% were соmbіnаtіоn truсkѕ (trасtоr-trаіlеr, dоublеѕ, straight truсk wіth trаіlеr, еtс.).

Truck ассіdеntѕ аrе сlеаrlу a tragedy, fоr thе victims and for thоѕе causing the accident. If уоu hаvе ever bееn involved іn a саr ассіdеnt mу rесоmmеndаtіоn wоuld be to соntасt www.helpinginjuredpeople.com/personal-injury-attorney/motor-vehicle-collisions/truck-accident-lawyer/ tо gеt аll the lеgаl help уоu nееd.

The totality is – the Prime Minister lied

Right. OK then! Now I get it (slap forehead). How could I have been so slow on the uptake? I understood until yesterday that the Prime Minister had been caught out in a great big fat steaming smoking-pants lie. I thought it was clear to the meanest intelligence that Tony Blair had authorised the naming of poor Dr David Kelly to the media, and then pretended otherwise.

But it turns out that we haven’t been paying enough attention to the “totality” of what he said. No, no, he kept saying yesterday, as he wriggled before Michael Howard like a kebabbed witchetty grub. Only the “totality” is operative, said Blair, irresistibly recalling the performance of Nixon’s spokesman during Watergate. Well, let us indeed examine the totality of the Prime Minister’s words and deeds, and discover how we came by this misunderstanding. They total up to quite a lot.

Read the full article as published in the Telegraph