DVDs and the erosion of public morals
The risk of going on holiday with friends is that you inadvertently expose the vagaries of your child-rearing methods to the scrutiny of others. Some parents seem to be breast-feeding lusty six-year-olds. Some of them have strange systems of potty training. And I am now accused by my fellow parents of being eccentrically liberal in what I consider suitable for the kiddies to watch on television.
Read the rest of this entry and add your comments.
It happened like this. We were all chuckling at a DVD of For Your Eyes Only, a superbly bad 1981 Bond film starring Roger Moore, and I was just thinking what wholesome family viewing it was.
For those of us in the throes of middle age it was cheering to watch the elderly Roger Moore as he creaked around the set while younger, fitter women flung themselves at his wobbly jowls. It is not so much an action movie as an anti-ageism tract.
So there we were giggling away, when another friend and mother came in and said – very nicely – would we mind pressing the pause button, because she didn’t want her 11-year-old exposed to the sex’n'violence of James Bond; and of course we immediately complied, though I was puzzled. There was no swearing; the violence was so parodic as to be completely undisturbing. As for sex, the only racy scene involved Bond and the girl taking off their dressing gowns, so that you saw their undraped knees – in the case of Roger Moore, a reassuringly wrinkly knee.
What was wrong with that, I wondered; and then another parent piped up and observed that we let our children watch a film called Hot Fuzz – an acutely observed satire of rural policing – even though it carried a 15 certificate, and most of our children were not yet 15. Yes, said someone else, and what about this DVD of Shaun of the Dead? Don’t tell me you let your children watch Shaun of the Dead? Er, yes, I said.
Like families across Britain, our family has been richly entertained by the bit where they bludgeon the zombies with cricket bats, and the bit in Hot Fuzz where the spire falls from the church and skewers someone.
But I have to admit that under the interrogation of my friends I felt a spasm of guilt. Am I contributing to the erosion of public morals? Am I failing to set the right boundaries? Am I partly responsible for Broken Britain?
Well, yes, you are, said one friend and mother. These James Bond films glamorised violence, she argued. They carried the implication that chaps with guns were successful with women, and she didn’t like the way her three-year-old rushed around pointing his finger and going bang.
And what’s this, said someone else, riffling through the pile of DVDs: not Desperate Housewives! Not Sex and the City! Did we really let our children watch these shows? I don’t think I am grown-up enough to cope with a full episode of Sex and the City, since it is Aristophanic in its vulgarity, but I had to admit that some of our children might have seen some of it, and they might have seen some of Desperate Housewives; and by this time I realised that I stood convicted in the eyes of my peers.
We have been so lax as to allow our nation’s future – at their most impressionable age – to be exposed to shattering images of New York harlots, exsanguinating zombies and Roger Moore’s knees.
I have been racking my brains for a defence, and the first point to make is that we are always slightly stunned to discover what the younger generation is reading or watching. I remember my grandmother being amazed that I was reading David Niven’s risqué memoir, The Moon’s a Balloon; and no one stopped me picking up Flashman, at the age of 11, and discovering that the hero gets off to a cracking start in life by being expelled from school and raping his father’s mistress.
I speak for most of my generation when I say that in every group of 13-year-old boys there was always a porn merchant who did a lively trade in Knave or Fiesta before going on to hone his skills at Morgan Stanley or Goldman Sachs.
Did these literary or visual stimuli corrupt us, or make us any more dysfunctional than we would otherwise have been? I doubt it, any more than children in fifth-century Athens would have been corrupted by sneaking a look at the images on their parents’ red‑figure calyx-craters.
Every generation is phobic about the effect of new technology on the morals of the next, and the truth is, I don’t like the idea of kids spending hours on the web, probably being groomed by paedophiles from Liège; and yet all the kids I know – whatever they have been goggling at – seem remarkably unruffled, and surprisingly moralistic. No matter how sordid the programmes, they disapprove vehemently of swearing. Anything remotely racist or homophobic sounds much more profane, to their ears, than it did to children 30 years ago. I could direct you to an 11-year‑old who certainly likes Desperate Housewives, but the show she really loves is called High School Musical and is so clean as to be positively emetic.
Sometimes I think our censoriousness is not so much about protecting children as it is about preventing them from seeing the embarrassing silliness of adult behaviour. Of course there must be limits. It’s just that I am not sure we always put them in the right place. The satirical schlock of Hot Fuzz is apparently only suitable for those of 15 and above, while the much nastier and more violent Batman yarn, The Dark Knight, rates only a 12A. What’s that about? In so far as there is any potential for corruption in these films, it depends, I suppose, on what else is going on in the lives of our kids and what else they do with their time.
The real trouble is that they watch too much blasted electronic media altogether, and for a treatment of this painful issue I direct you to the micro-selling volume, The Perils of the Pushy Parents, by me, published by HarperCollins, and still available at the local Oxfam.
[First published in the Daily Telegraph on 24 Februrary 2009 under the heading, "How, exactly, will Roger Moore's knees corrupt my children?"]
Read the rest of this entry and add your comments.
70 Comments
Suzanne popular culture is hugely influential in shaping our society today. Trends in cinema and DVDs have a knock on effect that can be good or bad.
Rate This:
0 
0
Ah, Paul: when was there last a decent performance of Wasps/Lysistrata to just enjoy rather than be ‘educated by’? SATC is best in ten minute chunks – the ten where the real fans share the biccies (US = cookies) and a good giggle is possible. Keep watching. Oops, we can’t – except repeats. A bit like Aristophanes, really? (Though, somehow, I can’t see them doing SATC reruns 2000 years from now).
Rate This:
0 
0
“Morals” and “morality” are not the subject opinion. Opinions are irrelevant – even all of mine. “Morals” and “morality” are not the same things as “values” and “ethics”, which move around like stock prices.
Discussion on this topic ought NOT to concern itself with the many ageist offences taken at James Bond’s wrinkly knee caps or with utterly useless comparisons about how far the Jones’ go with their children’s viewing.
This is a serious topic and it’s about objective realities – it’s about what constitutes a morally sound environment against the complete slavery we almost all suffer today of running after every whim. It’s about the formation of happy homes and the education of our children. They are tomorrow’s whole society. The ancient Greeks’ definition of an ‘educated man’ could be summarised by saying “one who knows HOW to spend his free time”.
This, his search for truth, will “set him free”. Free from what? you may ask, well, to begin with, free from himself and his feverish search for short-term gains (be they simple pleasures or profits). The “fever” keeps him from employing his time ‘cultivating’, as it were, himself.
How much time and effort, (money also) is spent on managing the ‘effects’ of our collective laziness. We place more weapons in the hands of our forces without ever coming to an agreement on what how and when to fight, we place more policemen on our streets and want more room in our jails and yet we deliver an educational to our children which has become so politically correct ad so multi-ethically tolerant we no longer can define who we ourselves are! Where is our Tradition? – which is Christian. Where is our England? Where is that place to which so many aspire to reside yet no one can say what it is! ….. because it is lost…let’s hope not forever.
We need more liberal education (pre-”Enlightenment” liberal education)
Rate This:
0 
0
As an avid film fan, I have to say, there are some absolutely beautiful films out on DVD… IL Y A LONGTEMPS QUE JE T’AIME is just out, with Kristen Scott Thomas….. sublime.
MOLIERE is still available on DVD, absolutely first class, funny, emotional, moving, everything you would wish for from a French film.
CYRANO DE BERGERAC is a masterpiece and one of Gerard Depardieu’s best parts, such a beautiful story. He is also brilliant in Dumas, THE COUNT OF MONTE CRISTO.
THE CLOSET, another French film which is hilarious; Daniel Auteuil is about to lose his job, so takes advantage of political correctness and claims he is gay, figuring correctly that HR will be too scared of breaching political correctness to go through with it. Gerard Depardieu plays a macho rugby player and his team mates tease him that Daniel Auteuil is attracted to him. This brings out Depardieu’s latent feminine side and he actually falls for Auteuil! Oh it is very very funny.
I could talk about films all night, but will stop in case I am boring you all.
French films are so much more beautiful and subtle and deal with the emotions so much better than English films.
Rate This:
0 
0
RIDICULE is another amazing French film. I must not forget ARSENE LUPIN.
Then there is the fabulous TROP BELLE POUR TOI when Gerard Depardieu has the most beautiful wife imaginable (Carole Bouquet) but he falls in love with his dumpy, plain secretary and nobody understands why…. the wife is just too beautiful to be true, too beautiful for him, “trop belle pour toi!”
Rate This:
0 
0
ps. My guilty secret…. I saw MOLIERE nine times in the cinema.
When I was little, I was a good little girl except for the fact that I would bunk off school and go to the cinema and sit there daydreaming for hours and hours…..NO-ONE EVER FOUND OUT.
I better stop now.
Rate This:
0 
0
pps. the film I have seen most in the cinema is THE DEER HUNTER and I went to see that thirteen times in all.
Rate This:
0 
0
I think it is the same thing as Andy Warhol said. He would play the most stupid pop song over and over and over again and he said it was so he could REALLY UNDERSTAND IT.
Rate This:
0 
0
The “real” “problem” here is not “morals” nor “mores” nor even “values” or “ethics” but rather “quotation marks.”
Rate This:
0 
0
Since everyone seems to be talking about French films here, Jean-Luc Godard’s Contempt is spectacular, particularly the Criterion Collection DVD of it. Brigitte Bardot is fabulous and Jack Palance is a scream, as usual. The film’s themes tie in very nicely with The Odyssey.
Rate This:
0 
0
Kristine, Thank you for that! I will make sure to see it.
MOLIERE is spectacular – the theme is that at first Moliere wrote and acted in tragedies, but without much success. The story of how he came to write inspirational comedy is the theme of the film and Romain Duris gives full rein to his comedic talents, particularly when he is imitating a steed from the Carmargue! HILARIOUS. The French aristocracy is mercilessly ridiculed.
In ARSENE LUPIN, the same actor excels as the suave French pickpocket, who follows his dead father in becoming a thief, but is more moral than his father. Duris is led astray by the beautiful but wicked Countess (Kristin Scott Thomas, French impeccable), whose jealousy is his undoing. Stunning, meticulously researched period detail, and in the end a lupin (one of my favourite flowers) lies on the ground as the camera pans in for a closeup.
Rate This:
0 
0
Thing is, where do you draw the line?
Some years ago I was undergoing an inspection of my home with a view to child-minding. My son was sitting quietly watching an archaeology programme and the Ofstead inspector took me to task for allowing him access to unsuitable material.
Apparently, as she entered the room they were in the process of cleaning up a human skull which she assured me was likely to be highly disturbing to my precious little lamb and could cause long term damage.
My son, never one to mince his words although he was only 7 at the time, pointed out that she was very being silly, and that a dead body without a skull would be much scarier. He then suggested she watch the rest of the programme just in case one came up (I strongly suspect he was hoping to frighten her).
Having also been taken to task for allowing my kids to watch natural history programmes with mating and hunting scenes, I have decided I have much more faith in my children’s judgement than I do in the ‘expert’ opinions on what is suitable for a particular age group.
Rate This:
0 
0
Kat H, the Ofsted inspector sounds like an idiot, and your son sounds like an extremely intelligent, sensible little boy.
Rate This:
0 
0
Two beautiful French films…. Jean de Florette and Manon des sources. Once again, Gerard Depardieu triumphs, and Daniel Auteuil and Yves Montand are brilliant as the two wily, ruthless peasants who scheme to rob Depardieu, and succeed until fate turns the tables.
Brilliant photography, stunning views of Provence.
Rate This:
0 
0
MAN ON WIRE won an Oscar for best documentary, another stunning British triumph. The theme is an act of artistic and acrobatic insurrection, Philip Pettit walks on a tightrope between two N.Y. skyscrapers without a net.
At the Oscar ceremony, when juggler, acrobat and pick pocket Philip Pettit received the Oscar, he balanced it perfectly ON HIS NOSE! AN AMAZING MAN.
The film is out on DVD, don’t miss it.
Rate This:
0 
0
I am quite surprised to see so many people writing about the stupid movies themselves instead of about the subject of the column : “can you let your children watch this movie?”. It seems to me that some people are missing the point?
Anyway : Mr. Johnson : you frequently make me smile when I read these columns of yours.
“How, exactly, will Roger Moore’s knees corrupt my children?” Excellent!
Please keep the stories coming.
Rate This:
0 
0
Rob, I’m recommending DVDs for the Mayor’s kids that are better than the ones they have been watching. Relevant surely?
Rate This:
0 
0
Rob, I’m still wondering what school that 11 year-old goes to. Each parent to their own set of values but wrinkly knees is decidedly mild. Some eleven year olds (and far older people, too) cannot cope with too much red cinematic gloop masquerading as blood and get nightmares, some get affected by well-written scarey music. Both of those reasons seem quite sensible to me – but a family holiday with presumably several adults and children and lots of knees doing the usual trips to bathroom, pool, clothes locker? Young children take that for granted. Older children know where bare knees are acceptable in public. The transition from one set of perception of knees to the other happens mostly imperceptibly in psychologically well-adjusted houses and if it so happens that the child is on holiday with a mixed group of adults and children having a chuckle at an ancient movie well, better that than some of the options.
Rate This:
0 
0
‘ Some parents seem to be breast-feeding lusty six-year-olds ‘ ( Boris )
And lusty Mr.J was watching from his deck-chair…
Rate This:
0 
0
I agree with Mr. Johnson. A lots of DVD films out there are so corruptive. Example:
- Dante’s Cove; a new Hollywood gay vampires film where they will suck anything except blood.
- BrokenBack Mountain; a new Hollywood trendy cowboys film where the cowboys will pitch their tent poles anywhere except the ground. No wonder they break their backs.
- 9 1/2 Weeks; where they will do aything with a banana except eating it.
- 9 Songs; ooh, I can’t even bring myself to describe its deprave story to you all… sorry.
It’s amazing what people can get up to with just a bit of imagination, really.
It looks like just because we have stopped complaining, people are getting out of control. Bring back Mary Whitehouse, I say.
Talking about breast-feeding; I wonder if Mr. Johnson would complain if it was Pamela Anderson who was breast-feeding her little boy in front of him?
Rate This:
0 
0
A discussion of French cinema would not be complete without Jeremy Clarkson’s sensitive take on the subject, (from today’s SUN.)
“…when it comes to making films, we British are usually very rubbish. We’re even worse than the French. At least with French cinema, the girls eventually get their kit of and end up doing lesbionics.”
Rate This:
0 
0
Oh, remember that film with Marlon Brando? ‘The Last Tango In Paris’, innit? Waaaarhey! And I thought butter was only for cooking and breakfast toasts.
The only reason I decided to overlook this really pervasive film when it first came out was because Brando’s in it and I thought if he wanted to try it on with me, I might as well throw all my cautions to the wind and to Hell with it.
But now, being older and wiser, and because Mr. Johnson is complaining about these perversive DVD films, I thought The Last Tango In Paris should be classified as CORRUPTIVE, too.
Yours sincerely,
Bee.
Rate This:
0 
0
Angela, don’t you mean ‘the girls eventually get their kit off and end up doing AEROBIC ‘ ?
Rate This:
0 
0
Boris, I think Angela is in love with you.
Rate This:
0 
0
Angela, have you seen that French DVD film ‘Anatomy of Hell’? And ‘Cockles and Muscles’, another French flick on DVD? Oh, my sweet Lord Truscott! Frightfully perversive! You just can’t trust the French to make a film unless they’re six feet under, really. And these DVD films are on sale in High Street HMVs!
I only bought Dante’s Cove, Brokenback Mountain, Cockles and Muscles by mistake- I thought they were horror, cowboys and seafood cooking films. I’m sure Mr.Johnson made the same mistakes when he bought those corruptive DVDs with such misleading titles. And when you watch them at home, you feel angry because they were not what you had in mind when you bought them.
I hope Mr.Johnson will use his powers to stop these corruptive DVDs get into the main streams.
Yours sincerely,
Bee.
Rate This:
0 
0
DVDs are rated, if you bother to check the rating.
Rate This:
0 
0
[...] phobic about the effects of new technology on the next,’ Boris Johnson, the Mayor of London, cautions on his website (well worth a read). He goes on to offer his own diagnosis: I don’t like the idea of kids [...]
Rate This:
0 
0
‘ The spectacular collapse of some of the post-communist tiger economies has lead to a demand for a rescue fund of £170 BILLION (!!!) to stop social collapse in the Eastern nations spilling over into the rest of EUROPE ! ‘
Google: NEW IRON CURTAIN WILL SPLIT EU’S RICH AND POOR DAVID CHARTER THE TIMES MARCH 2 2009
It looks like now the West has to mop up the mess left behind by the Russian ruthless communists !!!
Sunday Express, 1/3/2009, ‘ Maybe EU elite will listen now’, by Jason Grows:
‘Meanwhile, Czech President Vaclav Klaus likened the EU to ‘ A ONE-PARTY STATE ‘ which ‘ is out of touch with the people of Europe ‘
‘Klause, whose upbringing under communism leaves him well placed to recognise the ‘ SIGNS of a one-party state’ (!!!), did not pull no punch. He was rewared with an extra-ordinary display of petulance by MEP Parliamentarians.’ They are MEPs or you can call them ‘Left-wing, socialist, Russian communists’ cronies !!! Hahahaha !!!!
Rate This:
0 
0
A DVD I would absolutely recomment any parent to show young teenage children is THE TIMES OF HARVEY MILK. This is not the Oscar winning movie MILK, but a documentary of the same subject, that also won an Oscar in 1984, the story of how Harvey Milk became the first openly gay person to hold office in the US.
It is a lesson to us all just what gay people until quite recently have had to suffer, and we should all know what courage it took for Harvey Milk to campaign outright for human rights for gay people, even though he was aware the whole time that he might be assassinated. (There were a lot of nutcases and bigots around at that time. )
If Sean Penn is charming and endearing in the role of Harvey Milk, the real Harvey Milk as shown in this documentary, is ten times as captivating. He was an eloquent, delightful man, with a wry, puckish humour and outstanding charisma. Deeply kind and compassionate,and a skilled speaker and politician, he fought not only for the rights of all gay people, but for other minorities in the US, the Chinese, senior citizens, Jews, (he was Jewish himself)anyone who suffered oppression.
Because he had such a winning personality, he made huge headway in getting gays accepted. Nobody who knew him could fail to be won over. The thing I found most appealing, was the way he would react when faced with slurs against gays, accusations of bestiality, being paedophiles, etcs. At times he would respond with the most natural gales of laughter, showing the absurdity of the insults. He always had a smile on his face, and his joking and fun were extremely attractive. In spite of his light touch, he showed the most tremendous courage in the way he fought for oppressed minorities, at a time when Jimmy Carter was still worried about being photographed with a gay person. He urged every gay person to find the courage to come out and be open about who they truly were, and inspired by Harvey’s example, thousands did just that.
This film is an impassioned and profoundly moving portrait of a community in conflict, and an inspiring and unmissable experience.
Rate This:
0 
0
Most people don’t have the time to go shopping for DVDs that aren’t mainstream. Let me introduce you to the delights of Amazon. All you do is register online, and at the click of a button, you can buy all the French, US movies not available over here, art movies, ANYTHING with the minimum of fuss. You can do the same on E-bay.
At these places, you can also buy most DVDs second hand, and since they are good as new, what does it matter if they are not totally new and they are much cheaper? Oh yes, staying in is the new going out, prawn pancakes with white wine sauce, a glass of wine and a great film, what could be better?
Three or four days later after you have paid, the package pops through your letter box…..
Rate This:
0 
0
My neighbours little boys (5 and 6) love DVDs and films and she supervises their viewing very well – she looks for good films for them to watch, but is very careful about the content.
Over the weekend, they informed us they had decided to make a film themselves. “What are you going to call it?” we asked. Came the reply “INDECENT EXPOSURE”. Unusual title, said their mum, what’s that about? “Two photographers” came the innocent reply.
Rate This:
0 
0
Have you watched that film ‘The Line Of Beauty’ made by…. (drum call).. THE BBC ?!! I bought its DVD by mistake- I thought it was about male fashion contest or something. Well, it’s not. Five minutes into the film and the hunky , handsome men are already taking them out and putting about like rabbits. I was sooooo annoyed I had to watch it right to the end to find out for myself how deprave it was.
Rate This:
0 
0
Here’s a must see Subversive playlist from youtube, you’d be far better off letting your kids be educated by watching what the establishment is doing to their impressionable minds in order to shape how they Wants society to turn out.
.
Must see Playlist
Rate This:
0 
0
Bee it’s OK to watch these movies by accident, but when you find you are starring in them,you have to worry.
Rate This:
0 
0
Video games are also a huge area of concern because of the effect they have on the young. Keith Vaz raised a question in the House yesterday. HH said the government was aware and advised parents to always check the ratings of these games. there was mention of the Byron report, which contains useful help for parents.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/pda/2008/mar/27/post
Rate This:
0 
0
As a parent, I am very concerned about video games. Some of them are appallingly violent.
Rate This:
0 
0
Also, in defence of Roger Moore, I have to say, he was convincing as an ex. Old Etonian, which is more than Sean Connery, Daniel Craig and George Lazenby are. Sean Connery wasn’t even convincingly English! Can;t he ever play a part without that Scots accent! i’m not a fan, actually.
Timothy Dalton was also convincing as an ex. public school boy. I like him and think he was much maligned as Bond. His portrayal was quite complex.
Rate This:
0 
0
Video games should definitely be vetted by parents, huge danger here.
Rate This:
0 
0
DVDs not to watch. Anything starring Vin Diesel. Vin Diesel makes Arnie Schwartzenegger look like Einstein. Anything starring Renee Zellwigger! EEEUUUGGGHHHH.
Rate This:
0 
0
Boris, you’re not contributing to Britain’s moral downfall, you’ve introduced your children to the wonders of British comedy, which despite the dominance of American cinema is still the finest in the world. Tell these silly women to get a grip. Did James Bond want to make me get a gun and kill people, no! (Well maybe the occasional super-villain; Mugabe beware!) He did make realise that there was a point to girls though (Even if that point was to run around in a bikini and melt in the presence of my manliness!). Keep introducing your children to these great movies our country has produced, I used to love watching a good comedy with my dad. When they’re a little older I would introduce them to maybe the finest comedy and satire of all time, Life of Brian. Sure, it’ll take a few watches over the years to fully understand all the jokes, but that’s the fun in it.
Comedy…it truly puts the Great into Great Britain!
Rate This:
0 
0
Saw the trailer of a film last week that seems to embody everything that is morally wrong with British cinema. It is called DUPLICITY. Two business colleagues and ex-lovers (Julia Roberts and Clive Owen) don’t like their bosses, so that jusifies them in pulling a heist to steal £40 million from their employers.
What makes the film even more cool, admirable, and laudable is…. THEY DON’T EVEN TRUST EACH OTHER! Because trust is for losers, right? Cynicism is cool. Especially in relationships. If you trust someone, let alone love them with all your heart and soul, you are immediately marked out as an absolute DORK.
What super peachy fun this movie must be! Theft, and the two main protagonists, apparently in a relationship, are lying to each other as well!!! ROLE MODELS FOR THE NEW MILLENIUM.
Rate This:
0 
0
Rob: enjoy those movies and may your kids and your friends’ kids laugh with you.
Rate This:
0 
0
The earlier James Bond movies are so harmless. How can anyone disapprove of these, ridiculous.
Rate This:
0 
0
You actually allowed someone to come into your home a tell you what to do. My home, my rules, if you don’t like it then LEAVE!
When my son was about three, I used to be woken up at ungodly hours of the morning because he had got up and put the uncut version of Robocop on. A film that would have most of the people who have left comments here running for the bathroom, if they hadn’t already fainted dead away. He used to howl with laughter. He hasn’t grown up to be some deranged, psychotic serial killer. Didn’t any of you pay cowboys and Indians when you were kids.
When he was old enough I sat him down and explained that none of it was real. My dad did the same with me after watching The Wild Bunch. A particularly violent western from 1969.
I have always been interested in movie special effects, so I made a bottle of fake blood. Then, using a particular make of rubber based glue I turned him into a little zombie and he loved it. He also got the message. Your friends should give their kids some credit, they can think for themselves.
As for heist movies, they are great. The Ocean movies show that to get what you want, you need to plan, and think it through. For that you need an education. The characters don’t run into a bank waving shotguns around threatening to blow peoples heads off. Again, this shows you can get what you want without hurting others.
The real bank robbers are people like Sir Fred Goodwin and other bank bosses. £703,000 a year for running a major bank into the ground, destroying peoples lives and getting away with it. The head of RBS in the States, Larry Fish has just retired, his pension works out at £1.6million a year. If that isn’t daylight robbery I don’t know what is.
MP’s are just as bad, claiming thousands of pounds in allowances for secretaries who turn out to be nannies, or assistants that turn out to be their sons and haven’t done a jot of work in their lives.
If your idiot friends are going to get angry it should be about something that matters, not sitting around their dinner tables, whinging a’la Rory Bremner and Co.
Massive frauds are being committed by major public figures and MP’s every day. BE ANGRY AT THAT!
Rate This:
0 
0
Brian, doesn’t taking millions of pounds of other peoples’ money hurt them? Just because the Ocean movies show stealing without violence, it is still stealing.
This new film, DUPLICITY for example, shows two friends using their brains…. TO STEAL FORTY MILLION POUNDS. The film is glorifying stealing.
Many people admired the film PRETTY WOMAN. Woman sells sex for money. The fact that she was pretty was nothing to do with the fact that what she was doing was morally reprehensible, or would you let your daughter play at being a hooker and get her a cute little hooker outfit? I’m sure you wouldn’t.
Rate This:
0 
0
You’re right Angela, it was the middle of the night when I was having my little ramble.
Again I come back to the point about sitting your children down and explaining the difference between the fantasy that tv/movies present us, and real life.
As for Pretty Woman,it’s an awful film. In my opinion Julia Roberts is one of the most over rated actresses ever, and ugly as sin to boot.
Seriously though, you have got on to a subject that does make me particularly angry, because there are parents who do let their 13 and 14 year old daughters out looking like hookers. Fortunately I’ve not heard of any being attacked or abducted locally, but unfortunately it is probably going to happen, and when it does these parents are going to have to take some of the responsibility. I’m going to stop here as I feel a rather lengthy rant coming on, and it wouldn’t to disagree with you Angela!!!!
Rate This:
0 
0
Brian, I so agree with you. To see kids even younger than 12 in nail varnish, cropped tops and mini heels, aping Britney is dreadfully sad. Don’t worry about disagreeing with me, because actually I am behind you on this 100%.
ps. My only concern is that although you are great in the way you sit your kids down and carefully explain, so many parents do not. Youngsters therefore begin to think it is clever to plan heists and rob casinos, banks or whatever.
I also agree about being angry with all the banks and the people there that have ripped off the public without a qualm. Terrible.
Rate This:
0 
0
Angela, I’ve been reading through some of the earlier posts. You seem to have a lot to say on this subject. Your posts have made me laugh(in a good way), but ii have come to a conclusion . . . it’s you who are responsible for the walls of civilization crashing around our ears. skipping school to go to the movies, being able to quote Jeremy Clarkson, and reading the Sun. Shameful
PS. I could never watch an episode of Sex in the City without throwing something at the tv!
Rate This:
0 
0
Brian, you could be right! Seriously, when I worked in fashion I read the tabloids as well as serios newspapers and found them invaluable because part of my job, was following and hopefully setting trends. I still read the tabloids as well as serious papers, because I still like to follow trends. I have watched Sex and the City, in fact I was given the complete set, but I do not approve of these women!
I made you laugh. That is the main thing.
Rate This:
0 
0
Angela, you should have your own website. Seriously.
)
I was baffled that The Dark Knight only received a 12A rating. Obviously Warner Bros knew that children would want to see a Batman film and that the studio would lose out on a lot of money if the film were to receive a rating that would restrict younger viewers from seeing it. I can’t help but think that the people who decided which rating the movie deserved were “financially encouraged” to settle on a 12A rating, but that’s getting into conspiracy theory territory.
I thought The Dark Knight was great for all the reasons Angela’s already mentioned.
Has anyone noticed that when it comes to movie ratings, movies with sex scenes are considered far more taboo than movies with extreme violence? It’s ok for fifteen year olds to see gun toting sociopaths blow holes through each other but heaven forbid they see a man and woman together in a bed.
Which is the scarier thought? A fifteen year old with sex on the brain or a fifteen year old with extreme violence and homicide on the brain? You decide.
Rate This:
0 
0