<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Saddam Hussein</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boris-johnson.com/2007/01/04/saddam-hussein/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boris-johnson.com/2007/01/04/saddam-hussein/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 20:46:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Insomniac</title>
		<link>http://www.boris-johnson.com/2007/01/04/saddam-hussein/comment-page-4/#comment-16354</link>
		<dc:creator>Insomniac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://80.82.117.242/?p=325#comment-16354</guid>
		<description>Thanks JAQ. I ll try and remember that.

Tayles- by &lt;i&gt;&quot;...... a lot of it goes on there.&quot; &lt;i&gt;

I did mean  &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fagging&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fagging&lt;/a&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks JAQ. I ll try and remember that.</p>
<p>Tayles- by <i>&#8220;&#8230;&#8230; a lot of it goes on there.&#8221; </i><i></p>
<p>I did mean  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fagging" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fagging</a></i></p>
<p>Rate This: <img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="up-16354" src="http://www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16354', 'add', 'www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-16354-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="down-16354" src="http://www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16354', 'subtract', 'www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-16354-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaq</title>
		<link>http://www.boris-johnson.com/2007/01/04/saddam-hussein/comment-page-4/#comment-16353</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://80.82.117.242/?p=325#comment-16353</guid>
		<description>Insomniac - you&#039;re very welcome. But remember that using bold instead of blockquote is a bit like raising your voice. Not quite SHOUTING, but &lt;b&gt;almost&lt;/b&gt;.

Anyway, give it a go and if you get stuck, shout!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Insomniac &#8211; you&#8217;re very welcome. But remember that using bold instead of blockquote is a bit like raising your voice. Not quite SHOUTING, but <b>almost</b>.</p>
<p>Anyway, give it a go and if you get stuck, shout!</p>
<p>Rate This: <img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="up-16353" src="http://www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16353', 'add', 'www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-16353-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="down-16353" src="http://www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16353', 'subtract', 'www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-16353-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Insomniac</title>
		<link>http://www.boris-johnson.com/2007/01/04/saddam-hussein/comment-page-4/#comment-16352</link>
		<dc:creator>Insomniac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://80.82.117.242/?p=325#comment-16352</guid>
		<description>Dear Mr.Scaley Tayles (You old devil ),

&lt;b&gt;&quot;It does look like we&#039;ve wandered off topic, but you took us there when you began complaining about the inconsistent and feeble sentencing in this country. I wholeheartedly agree with you that this is a problem and we need to toughen things up. Perhaps we can discuss the best way of achieving this elswhere. &quot;&lt;b&gt;

Glad you agree on that. Maybe, you could start another thread rather than clog up this one anymore.
&lt;b&gt;&quot;your argument is self defeating, since it implies that if tougher sentences were imposed, your reason for supporting capital punishment would cease to exist.&quot;&lt;b&gt;

Yes it would, if we could impose and make stick whole-life tariffs for every murderer of innocents.

&lt;b&gt;&quot;Besides, the talk of needlessly trading off the lives of innocent people at home in order to maintain the image of a tough justice system nauseates me. I suppose you would happily be dragged to the gallows in the knowledge that your death is a helpful part of the propaganda war against crime? It just goes to show that your support for capital punishment is nothing to do with the sanctity of human life; it is a fundamentally misanthropic and sadistic desire to see those who displease you expunged from the earth.&quot;&lt;b&gt;

Its nothing to do with image. I would nt happily  volunteer to be &#039;collateral damage&#039; in one of Blair&#039;s wars either. Does that mean i have to be an absolute pacifist? If i harboured  thoughts of &#039;revenge&#039; against  a sadistic murderer when i saw him walking early out of the prison gates  whistling a  merry tune would that make me momentarily as &#039;evil&#039; as him?

I think a lot of the arguing -past-each-other here occurs because you (and prob. Idlex) have a different conception of &#039;evil&#039; from me (and maybe Newmania K etc). To you it is like some outside force that we all plug into from time to time- a religion based view, i think. To me there is no evil ( well social evils like poverty, yes) outside of  what people choose to do in their lives ( humanist view?). Sometimes people reach a point of such malignancy and destructiveness that the rest of us decide they have to go- permanently, one way or another. I dont believe each life has equal sanctity, it depends whats been done with it.

&lt;b&gt;&quot;Trying to get me to soften my stance on the basis that the current prison system is in chaos or by drawing comparisons with deaths in combat simply implies that I am insufficiently tolerant of murder.&quot;&lt;b&gt;

To me you seem rather too tolerant of murder. Any legally sanctioned killing is not by definition murder (as you say wrt. Iraq.) But fair enough if you are an absolutist/fundamentalist on the DS. I never said it was good, just that i think it would generaly be the &#039;lesser evil&#039;  and preferable to the current situation.

&lt;b&gt;&quot;Try to imagine some issue on which you cannot imagine compromising. For instance, your right not to be tortured by your neighbour. I don&#039;t imagine that&#039;s as issue you see much room for manoeuvre on. I suspect that wre you to contemplate the means of dealing with your sadistic neighbour, one of the options you probably wouldn&#039;t consider is letting him to pop round occasionally with his drill and pliers. And if you had to fork out money to ensure that his power tools never got close to your body, this probably wouldn&#039;t change your mind either. &quot;&lt;b&gt;

If i had to deal with him i d definitely &#039;get my retaliation in first&#039; and worry about the consequences later! But i think you are hinting that i am your sadistic neighbour. Well i would nt torture you or anyone else Tayles , even if  you or the neighbour did it to me first.( Is that absolutist enough for you.?) I d just kill you (or him) after first giving a stern talking-to explaining why i (regretably) had to take that course of action. And, if you accuse me of being a foaming at the mouth sadist again i will come round and bite you!

&lt;b&gt;&quot;India, China and much of the South East Asia are dragging themselves out of abject misery by embracing capitalism and establishing property rights. Yes, it is not as easy road, but the price is worth it.&quot;&lt;b&gt;

Worth what price? In that of easily preventable child deaths today so that others can have &#039;jam tomorrow&#039;.

&lt;b&gt;&quot;Considering the wonky logic, argumentative gaffes, curious tangents, hapless question-begging and petulant name-calling that you have displayed here, I don&#039;t think you&#039;d need me to show you up in a proper debate. You&#039;d do that yourself.&quot;&lt;b&gt;

If i ve wandered off the point its because  i think your overall positions on these things are morally inconsistent and i ve been trying to get inside your thought processes ( not always an easy task ). You seem to want to restrict the terrain of the discussion purely to the question of the DS yes/no, right/wrong. You are probably used to winning the argument on that narrow point  in your abstract philosophical way. I am talking  &#039;lesser evilism&#039;  and trying to deal with the world as it is. This is not the Hutton enquiry. This DS discussion  involves wider issues, as with the whole TWAT thing. But now at least you see how frustrating it is to try and answer my points and then have me wander off on a tangent without answering yours back.!

&lt;b&gt;&quot;So you&#039;re calling for my imprisonment in a gulag or perhaps my summary execution now? &quot;&lt;b&gt;

I dont have a gulag to put you in Tayles. Regretably, extraordinary means may be the only ones available, so different rules apply in the early stages of the revolution!

&lt;b&gt;&quot;I&#039;m not sure if you&#039;re accusing me of being a toff, but it&#039;s an amusing accusation if you are. I didn&#039;t go to university, let alone Oxbridge; and I&#039;ve never been on a debating society in my life. &quot;&lt;b&gt;

&lt;b&gt;&quot;I did not go to university, but I was lucky enough to enjoy a private education, which did at least instill the notion of knowledge for its own sake, rather than the &#039;instrumentalist&#039; approach of the modern left.&quot;&lt;b&gt;

Well bully for you then!  I did nt  do any of that.
(except the instrumentalist bit unfortunately!)

Heres your agenda.

Tayles-&lt;b&gt;&quot;Remember those kids that were bullied at school? They&#039;re getting their own back.&quot;&lt;b&gt;

I m sorry you were bullied in private school Tayles. I ve heard a lot of it goes on there. So in the spirit of  true Christian compassion and forgiveness (and because you have ground me down in the war of typing attrition ) I humbly offer you my other cheek for you to strike the final blow. ( Others can decide who &#039;won&#039;)

JAQ- Thanks, I ll give that a go.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr.Scaley Tayles (You old devil ),</p>
<p><b>&#8220;It does look like we&#8217;ve wandered off topic, but you took us there when you began complaining about the inconsistent and feeble sentencing in this country. I wholeheartedly agree with you that this is a problem and we need to toughen things up. Perhaps we can discuss the best way of achieving this elswhere. &#8220;</b><b></p>
<p>Glad you agree on that. Maybe, you could start another thread rather than clog up this one anymore.<br />
</b><b>&#8220;your argument is self defeating, since it implies that if tougher sentences were imposed, your reason for supporting capital punishment would cease to exist.&#8221;</b><b></p>
<p>Yes it would, if we could impose and make stick whole-life tariffs for every murderer of innocents.</p>
<p></b><b>&#8220;Besides, the talk of needlessly trading off the lives of innocent people at home in order to maintain the image of a tough justice system nauseates me. I suppose you would happily be dragged to the gallows in the knowledge that your death is a helpful part of the propaganda war against crime? It just goes to show that your support for capital punishment is nothing to do with the sanctity of human life; it is a fundamentally misanthropic and sadistic desire to see those who displease you expunged from the earth.&#8221;</b><b></p>
<p>Its nothing to do with image. I would nt happily  volunteer to be &#8216;collateral damage&#8217; in one of Blair&#8217;s wars either. Does that mean i have to be an absolute pacifist? If i harboured  thoughts of &#8216;revenge&#8217; against  a sadistic murderer when i saw him walking early out of the prison gates  whistling a  merry tune would that make me momentarily as &#8216;evil&#8217; as him?</p>
<p>I think a lot of the arguing -past-each-other here occurs because you (and prob. Idlex) have a different conception of &#8216;evil&#8217; from me (and maybe Newmania K etc). To you it is like some outside force that we all plug into from time to time- a religion based view, i think. To me there is no evil ( well social evils like poverty, yes) outside of  what people choose to do in their lives ( humanist view?). Sometimes people reach a point of such malignancy and destructiveness that the rest of us decide they have to go- permanently, one way or another. I dont believe each life has equal sanctity, it depends whats been done with it.</p>
<p></b><b>&#8220;Trying to get me to soften my stance on the basis that the current prison system is in chaos or by drawing comparisons with deaths in combat simply implies that I am insufficiently tolerant of murder.&#8221;</b><b></p>
<p>To me you seem rather too tolerant of murder. Any legally sanctioned killing is not by definition murder (as you say wrt. Iraq.) But fair enough if you are an absolutist/fundamentalist on the DS. I never said it was good, just that i think it would generaly be the &#8216;lesser evil&#8217;  and preferable to the current situation.</p>
<p></b><b>&#8220;Try to imagine some issue on which you cannot imagine compromising. For instance, your right not to be tortured by your neighbour. I don&#8217;t imagine that&#8217;s as issue you see much room for manoeuvre on. I suspect that wre you to contemplate the means of dealing with your sadistic neighbour, one of the options you probably wouldn&#8217;t consider is letting him to pop round occasionally with his drill and pliers. And if you had to fork out money to ensure that his power tools never got close to your body, this probably wouldn&#8217;t change your mind either. &#8220;</b><b></p>
<p>If i had to deal with him i d definitely &#8216;get my retaliation in first&#8217; and worry about the consequences later! But i think you are hinting that i am your sadistic neighbour. Well i would nt torture you or anyone else Tayles , even if  you or the neighbour did it to me first.( Is that absolutist enough for you.?) I d just kill you (or him) after first giving a stern talking-to explaining why i (regretably) had to take that course of action. And, if you accuse me of being a foaming at the mouth sadist again i will come round and bite you!</p>
<p></b><b>&#8220;India, China and much of the South East Asia are dragging themselves out of abject misery by embracing capitalism and establishing property rights. Yes, it is not as easy road, but the price is worth it.&#8221;</b><b></p>
<p>Worth what price? In that of easily preventable child deaths today so that others can have &#8216;jam tomorrow&#8217;.</p>
<p></b><b>&#8220;Considering the wonky logic, argumentative gaffes, curious tangents, hapless question-begging and petulant name-calling that you have displayed here, I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;d need me to show you up in a proper debate. You&#8217;d do that yourself.&#8221;</b><b></p>
<p>If i ve wandered off the point its because  i think your overall positions on these things are morally inconsistent and i ve been trying to get inside your thought processes ( not always an easy task ). You seem to want to restrict the terrain of the discussion purely to the question of the DS yes/no, right/wrong. You are probably used to winning the argument on that narrow point  in your abstract philosophical way. I am talking  &#8216;lesser evilism&#8217;  and trying to deal with the world as it is. This is not the Hutton enquiry. This DS discussion  involves wider issues, as with the whole TWAT thing. But now at least you see how frustrating it is to try and answer my points and then have me wander off on a tangent without answering yours back.!</p>
<p></b><b>&#8220;So you&#8217;re calling for my imprisonment in a gulag or perhaps my summary execution now? &#8220;</b><b></p>
<p>I dont have a gulag to put you in Tayles. Regretably, extraordinary means may be the only ones available, so different rules apply in the early stages of the revolution!</p>
<p></b><b>&#8220;I&#8217;m not sure if you&#8217;re accusing me of being a toff, but it&#8217;s an amusing accusation if you are. I didn&#8217;t go to university, let alone Oxbridge; and I&#8217;ve never been on a debating society in my life. &#8220;</b><b></p>
<p></b><b>&#8220;I did not go to university, but I was lucky enough to enjoy a private education, which did at least instill the notion of knowledge for its own sake, rather than the &#8216;instrumentalist&#8217; approach of the modern left.&#8221;</b><b></p>
<p>Well bully for you then!  I did nt  do any of that.<br />
(except the instrumentalist bit unfortunately!)</p>
<p>Heres your agenda.</p>
<p>Tayles-</b><b>&#8220;Remember those kids that were bullied at school? They&#8217;re getting their own back.&#8221;</b><b></p>
<p>I m sorry you were bullied in private school Tayles. I ve heard a lot of it goes on there. So in the spirit of  true Christian compassion and forgiveness (and because you have ground me down in the war of typing attrition ) I humbly offer you my other cheek for you to strike the final blow. ( Others can decide who &#8216;won&#8217;)</p>
<p>JAQ- Thanks, I ll give that a go.</b></p>
<p>Rate This: <img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="up-16352" src="http://www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16352', 'add', 'www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-16352-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="down-16352" src="http://www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16352', 'subtract', 'www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-16352-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k</title>
		<link>http://www.boris-johnson.com/2007/01/04/saddam-hussein/comment-page-4/#comment-16351</link>
		<dc:creator>k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://80.82.117.242/?p=325#comment-16351</guid>
		<description>Tayles,
But surely if the death penalty was proven to be a detterant and there was no chance of innocents being found guilty then by refusing to implement it the government must be partly responible for dealing out the death penalty to hundreds of innocents.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tayles,<br />
But surely if the death penalty was proven to be a detterant and there was no chance of innocents being found guilty then by refusing to implement it the government must be partly responible for dealing out the death penalty to hundreds of innocents.</p>
<p>Rate This: <img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="up-16351" src="http://www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16351', 'add', 'www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-16351-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="down-16351" src="http://www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16351', 'subtract', 'www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-16351-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tayles</title>
		<link>http://www.boris-johnson.com/2007/01/04/saddam-hussein/comment-page-4/#comment-16350</link>
		<dc:creator>Tayles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://80.82.117.242/?p=325#comment-16350</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Tayles here is a question.
If it was proven that the death penalty was a deterrant and a much greater deterant than life imprisonment and that no innocents would be mistakenly found guilty?&lt;/i&gt;

No more than I would support house arrest for everyone in Britain to ensure that little or no crime took place.  My objections trump any potential benefits. I&#039;m not trying to be some kind of pious prat here and I don&#039;t have some illusion of immortality as Newmania suggested; I just want to live in a country where the government cannot deal out death to its wrong-doers.

Everyone&#039;s principles are for sale. You have to weigh up the pros and cons of any enterprise before coming to a conclusion.  I could still have huge moral misgivings about something and acquiesce to it on the basis that its advantages outweighed its costs.  However, there would have to be a truly astonishing and demonstrable benefit to the death penalty before I would budge on it.  That, despite Newmania&#039;s insistence, is not self-evident in this instance.

&lt;i&gt;If you saw a gang of five people dragging an innocent person off the street (a child, say) to kill them and the only way to stop them was to kill all five of them, what would you do?&lt;/i&gt;

I&#039;d kill them without a moment&#039;s hesitation. This is the same situation as the police marksman who takes down a terrorist about to set off a bomb. If he doesn&#039;t have the opportunity to arrest and detain them, there is no alternative.  It&#039;s regrettable, but what choice do you have? Contrary to Newmania&#039;s suggestion, I can differentiate between the victim and the wrong-doer.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Tayles here is a question.<br />
If it was proven that the death penalty was a deterrant and a much greater deterant than life imprisonment and that no innocents would be mistakenly found guilty?</i></p>
<p>No more than I would support house arrest for everyone in Britain to ensure that little or no crime took place.  My objections trump any potential benefits. I&#8217;m not trying to be some kind of pious prat here and I don&#8217;t have some illusion of immortality as Newmania suggested; I just want to live in a country where the government cannot deal out death to its wrong-doers.</p>
<p>Everyone&#8217;s principles are for sale. You have to weigh up the pros and cons of any enterprise before coming to a conclusion.  I could still have huge moral misgivings about something and acquiesce to it on the basis that its advantages outweighed its costs.  However, there would have to be a truly astonishing and demonstrable benefit to the death penalty before I would budge on it.  That, despite Newmania&#8217;s insistence, is not self-evident in this instance.</p>
<p><i>If you saw a gang of five people dragging an innocent person off the street (a child, say) to kill them and the only way to stop them was to kill all five of them, what would you do?</i></p>
<p>I&#8217;d kill them without a moment&#8217;s hesitation. This is the same situation as the police marksman who takes down a terrorist about to set off a bomb. If he doesn&#8217;t have the opportunity to arrest and detain them, there is no alternative.  It&#8217;s regrettable, but what choice do you have? Contrary to Newmania&#8217;s suggestion, I can differentiate between the victim and the wrong-doer.</p>
<p>Rate This: <img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="up-16350" src="http://www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16350', 'add', 'www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-16350-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="down-16350" src="http://www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16350', 'subtract', 'www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-16350-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tayles</title>
		<link>http://www.boris-johnson.com/2007/01/04/saddam-hussein/comment-page-4/#comment-16349</link>
		<dc:creator>Tayles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://80.82.117.242/?p=325#comment-16349</guid>
		<description>Newmania, you are hung up on this idea of proportion with regard to punishment. You seem to think that this is an irrefutable natural law, which trumps any objections I have to the death penalty. You accept that mutilating and torturing a criminal is unacceptable, but to kill them is fine and in proportion.

Custodial sentencing has a sense of proportion too: murder carries a stiffer term of imprisonment than theft (or it should, at least). You may dismiss two decades in jail as a trip to Butlins, but that is more a call for prison reform rather than a case for capital punishment.

&lt;i&gt;It follows that justice can, on occasion only be served by capital punishment.&lt;/i&gt;

You steadfastly refuse to understand my perspective. Let&#039;s try a different angle. Urging me to accept that capital punishment is sometimes the only fitting punishment is like telling a vegetarian that eating turkey is the only way to do Christmas dinner.  Does that help?  If not how about this: it&#039;s like asking a devout Christian to consider devil worship as a cure for their problems.

In other words, no matter how much of good case you put for the death penalty being a proportional punishment, I ain&#039;t buying it.  And don&#039;t expect an epiphany from me any time soon.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newmania, you are hung up on this idea of proportion with regard to punishment. You seem to think that this is an irrefutable natural law, which trumps any objections I have to the death penalty. You accept that mutilating and torturing a criminal is unacceptable, but to kill them is fine and in proportion.</p>
<p>Custodial sentencing has a sense of proportion too: murder carries a stiffer term of imprisonment than theft (or it should, at least). You may dismiss two decades in jail as a trip to Butlins, but that is more a call for prison reform rather than a case for capital punishment.</p>
<p><i>It follows that justice can, on occasion only be served by capital punishment.</i></p>
<p>You steadfastly refuse to understand my perspective. Let&#8217;s try a different angle. Urging me to accept that capital punishment is sometimes the only fitting punishment is like telling a vegetarian that eating turkey is the only way to do Christmas dinner.  Does that help?  If not how about this: it&#8217;s like asking a devout Christian to consider devil worship as a cure for their problems.</p>
<p>In other words, no matter how much of good case you put for the death penalty being a proportional punishment, I ain&#8217;t buying it.  And don&#8217;t expect an epiphany from me any time soon.</p>
<p>Rate This: <img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="up-16349" src="http://www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16349', 'add', 'www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-16349-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="down-16349" src="http://www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16349', 'subtract', 'www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-16349-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k</title>
		<link>http://www.boris-johnson.com/2007/01/04/saddam-hussein/comment-page-4/#comment-16348</link>
		<dc:creator>k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://80.82.117.242/?p=325#comment-16348</guid>
		<description>Tayles here is a question.
If it was proven that the death penalty was a deterrant and a much greater deterant than life imprisonment and that no innocents would be mistakenly found guilty (this is hypothetical, so humour me here) would you support the death penalty?

Surely, if you knew that hanging a convicted murderer would deter x amount of other would be murderers then to refuse to implement the death penalty would be knowingly allowing the murders of innocent men, women and children. Surely this would be putting our own morals above the sanctity of human life.

using the sancity of human life issue against the death penalty is a tricky one because it assumes that guilt is not important. If, hypothetically, you were told you had to (you have no choice of refusing, again just humour me) kill either one individual or a group of five individuals then you would, I assume, pick the one individual since this would save the lives of four extra people. However, if you saw a gang of five people dragging an innocent person off the street (a child, say) to kill them and the only way to stop them was to kill all five of them, what would you do? Would you allow them to murder the innocent person in order that four extra lives could be saved, after all the sanctity of life and all that or would you kill all five in order to save the innocent?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tayles here is a question.<br />
If it was proven that the death penalty was a deterrant and a much greater deterant than life imprisonment and that no innocents would be mistakenly found guilty (this is hypothetical, so humour me here) would you support the death penalty?</p>
<p>Surely, if you knew that hanging a convicted murderer would deter x amount of other would be murderers then to refuse to implement the death penalty would be knowingly allowing the murders of innocent men, women and children. Surely this would be putting our own morals above the sanctity of human life.</p>
<p>using the sancity of human life issue against the death penalty is a tricky one because it assumes that guilt is not important. If, hypothetically, you were told you had to (you have no choice of refusing, again just humour me) kill either one individual or a group of five individuals then you would, I assume, pick the one individual since this would save the lives of four extra people. However, if you saw a gang of five people dragging an innocent person off the street (a child, say) to kill them and the only way to stop them was to kill all five of them, what would you do? Would you allow them to murder the innocent person in order that four extra lives could be saved, after all the sanctity of life and all that or would you kill all five in order to save the innocent?</p>
<p>Rate This: <img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="up-16348" src="http://www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16348', 'add', 'www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-16348-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="down-16348" src="http://www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16348', 'subtract', 'www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-16348-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tayles</title>
		<link>http://www.boris-johnson.com/2007/01/04/saddam-hussein/comment-page-4/#comment-16347</link>
		<dc:creator>Tayles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://80.82.117.242/?p=325#comment-16347</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;So if it is wrong to take the life of a person who has chosen to take a life and thereby chosen to risk the death penalty then by your own reasoning it is also wrong to allow a mentally capable person the right to choose to refuse medical treatment, or in fact do anything that might kill them.&lt;/i&gt; - K

The distinction here is that with murder and execution we&#039;re talking about taking the life of another, as opposed to taking your own life.  I&#039;m actually undecided on the euthanasia issue, but if pressed on it I think I&#039;d be opposed to it.  On the one hand I support the freedom to do with your own life what you see fit, as long as it does no demonstrable harm to anyone else (outside of the grief it my cause loved ones, I suppose).  On the other hand, euthanasia in particular cheapens and devalues human life.  Everybody knows that doctors take humane measures to hasten death at the end, and we accept that individuals already are &#039;free&#039; to die, since nobody can prevent a determined suicide. But asking the government to endorse voluntary euthanasia is another matter. This is not only about the individuals involved. However desperate some may feel, we should not give official approval to the notion that death is a solution to the problems of living.

Even the most &#039;responsible&#039; right-to-die organizations advocate suicide as a therapeutic answer to depression.  Reports on the issue always confirm fear and depression, rather than pain, as the major role in assisted suicide requests.  This is dangerous, but more than this euthanasia destroys the real, if abstract, values that connect us and make us human beings.  Cowardice would become lionised as courage and the duty to make the most of what one has would become the duty to throw it away. The meaning of human life would be reduced to the physical, base animal instincts, trapped within the husk of the body. Human dignity would be reduced to bodily aestheticism.

&lt;i&gt;Should we also make suicide illegal, after all committing suicide is taking a life, the differrence is the victim has a choice.&lt;/i&gt;

I thought it was illegal, although maybe I&#039;m wrong.  I wouldn&#039;t want the government to endorse it by making it legal for the reasons above, but since you can&#039;t legislate people into not attempting suicide it would be a bit pointless either way.

&lt;i&gt;While I disagree with the death penalty for the reasons that newmania stated, I do believe it would solve the problem of deterring a criminal who has already committed a crime against their victim from murdering the victim in order to get away with the initial crime such as rape or sexual assault.&lt;/i&gt;

I can see the logic of this argument, but since my opposition to capital punishment is not based on its effectiveness as a deterrent, you will understand that I could never countenance this solution.  Actually, overuse of the death penalty causes problems of its own.  In the famous &#039;Onion Field&#039; case of the 1960s a couple of guys kidnapped and killed a police office on the understanding that kidnapping was a capital crime.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>So if it is wrong to take the life of a person who has chosen to take a life and thereby chosen to risk the death penalty then by your own reasoning it is also wrong to allow a mentally capable person the right to choose to refuse medical treatment, or in fact do anything that might kill them.</i> &#8211; K</p>
<p>The distinction here is that with murder and execution we&#8217;re talking about taking the life of another, as opposed to taking your own life.  I&#8217;m actually undecided on the euthanasia issue, but if pressed on it I think I&#8217;d be opposed to it.  On the one hand I support the freedom to do with your own life what you see fit, as long as it does no demonstrable harm to anyone else (outside of the grief it my cause loved ones, I suppose).  On the other hand, euthanasia in particular cheapens and devalues human life.  Everybody knows that doctors take humane measures to hasten death at the end, and we accept that individuals already are &#8216;free&#8217; to die, since nobody can prevent a determined suicide. But asking the government to endorse voluntary euthanasia is another matter. This is not only about the individuals involved. However desperate some may feel, we should not give official approval to the notion that death is a solution to the problems of living.</p>
<p>Even the most &#8216;responsible&#8217; right-to-die organizations advocate suicide as a therapeutic answer to depression.  Reports on the issue always confirm fear and depression, rather than pain, as the major role in assisted suicide requests.  This is dangerous, but more than this euthanasia destroys the real, if abstract, values that connect us and make us human beings.  Cowardice would become lionised as courage and the duty to make the most of what one has would become the duty to throw it away. The meaning of human life would be reduced to the physical, base animal instincts, trapped within the husk of the body. Human dignity would be reduced to bodily aestheticism.</p>
<p><i>Should we also make suicide illegal, after all committing suicide is taking a life, the differrence is the victim has a choice.</i></p>
<p>I thought it was illegal, although maybe I&#8217;m wrong.  I wouldn&#8217;t want the government to endorse it by making it legal for the reasons above, but since you can&#8217;t legislate people into not attempting suicide it would be a bit pointless either way.</p>
<p><i>While I disagree with the death penalty for the reasons that newmania stated, I do believe it would solve the problem of deterring a criminal who has already committed a crime against their victim from murdering the victim in order to get away with the initial crime such as rape or sexual assault.</i></p>
<p>I can see the logic of this argument, but since my opposition to capital punishment is not based on its effectiveness as a deterrent, you will understand that I could never countenance this solution.  Actually, overuse of the death penalty causes problems of its own.  In the famous &#8216;Onion Field&#8217; case of the 1960s a couple of guys kidnapped and killed a police office on the understanding that kidnapping was a capital crime.</p>
<p>Rate This: <img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="up-16347" src="http://www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16347', 'add', 'www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-16347-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="down-16347" src="http://www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16347', 'subtract', 'www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-16347-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k</title>
		<link>http://www.boris-johnson.com/2007/01/04/saddam-hussein/comment-page-4/#comment-16346</link>
		<dc:creator>k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://80.82.117.242/?p=325#comment-16346</guid>
		<description>If the only reason not to have the death penalty is because it is wrong to take a life then all forms of punishment must be stopped. Why is capital punishment murder yet arrest,imprisonment and fines are not kidnap, false imprisonment and blackmail? Considering that hundreds of people are murdered each year by those who have served time for murder and &quot;manslaughter&quot; then the death penalty would have saved lives, even if it does not act as a deterrant, since it would most certainly have prevented the murderer from reoffending. Of course a system that somehow resembles justice would also solve the problem. The current system only enocurages vioence and by refusing to protect its people the British government is tap dancing on the edges of the european human rights act. This must change. We live in a country where even the prime minister openly disregards the law and faces no consequences, so how can we expect the uneducated  thug predisposed to violence to stay within the law.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the only reason not to have the death penalty is because it is wrong to take a life then all forms of punishment must be stopped. Why is capital punishment murder yet arrest,imprisonment and fines are not kidnap, false imprisonment and blackmail? Considering that hundreds of people are murdered each year by those who have served time for murder and &#8220;manslaughter&#8221; then the death penalty would have saved lives, even if it does not act as a deterrant, since it would most certainly have prevented the murderer from reoffending. Of course a system that somehow resembles justice would also solve the problem. The current system only enocurages vioence and by refusing to protect its people the British government is tap dancing on the edges of the european human rights act. This must change. We live in a country where even the prime minister openly disregards the law and faces no consequences, so how can we expect the uneducated  thug predisposed to violence to stay within the law.</p>
<p>Rate This: <img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="up-16346" src="http://www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16346', 'add', 'www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-16346-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="down-16346" src="http://www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16346', 'subtract', 'www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-16346-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaq</title>
		<link>http://www.boris-johnson.com/2007/01/04/saddam-hussein/comment-page-4/#comment-16345</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://80.82.117.242/?p=325#comment-16345</guid>
		<description>Crikey Newmania!

Anyway folks - allow yourself to be introduced to BLOCKQUOTE. Remember that: &lt;b&gt;blockquote&lt;/b&gt; As some systems just use &#039;quote&#039; (and what&#039;s the betting I get them mixed up?)

Anyway: on this system you have to use the pointy brackets (next to the &#039;M&#039; on my keyboard) but as they won&#039;t show up in text I&#039;ll use curly ones &#039;{&#039; and you just substitute pointy one&#039;s.

So the string you need to type to enclose quoted text will be:

{blockquote}quoted text{/blockquote}
Got it?

and it should look something like this:&lt;blockquote&gt;My guess is that you are under the modern illusion of immortality and that the contemplation of death is something about which you are incapable of rational thought. It is simply to large a horror to think about .If you cannot think about it of course you will not be equipped to apply t justice in the caser of murder.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
This method can be used for bold: {b}text{/b} or italics {i}text{/i} etc. All you have to remember is to turn the formating on and off.

Have a go but remember to use the &lt;b&gt;Preview&lt;/b&gt; button first, before you post.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crikey Newmania!</p>
<p>Anyway folks &#8211; allow yourself to be introduced to BLOCKQUOTE. Remember that: <b>blockquote</b> As some systems just use &#8216;quote&#8217; (and what&#8217;s the betting I get them mixed up?)</p>
<p>Anyway: on this system you have to use the pointy brackets (next to the &#8216;M&#8217; on my keyboard) but as they won&#8217;t show up in text I&#8217;ll use curly ones &#8216;{&#8216; and you just substitute pointy one&#8217;s.</p>
<p>So the string you need to type to enclose quoted text will be:</p>
<p>{blockquote}quoted text{/blockquote}<br />
Got it?</p>
<p>and it should look something like this:<br />
<blockquote>My guess is that you are under the modern illusion of immortality and that the contemplation of death is something about which you are incapable of rational thought. It is simply to large a horror to think about .If you cannot think about it of course you will not be equipped to apply t justice in the caser of murder.</p></blockquote>
<p>This method can be used for bold: {b}text{/b} or italics {i}text{/i} etc. All you have to remember is to turn the formating on and off.</p>
<p>Have a go but remember to use the <b>Preview</b> button first, before you post.</p>
<p>Rate This: <img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="up-16345" src="http://www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16345', 'add', 'www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-16345-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="down-16345" src="http://www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('16345', 'subtract', 'www.boris-johnson.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-16345-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

