Comments on: Blognote from Boris

By: Dave

Dave — Mon, 31 Oct 2005 23:33:02 +0000

Boris,

i hear ur future leader is into snorting coke while banging call girls.

never thought i’d say it, but….wow….a Tory “in touch” with the common man

Lucky fella

Rate This: 0 0

By: Macarnie

Macarnie — Wed, 26 Oct 2005 12:58:58 +0000

I hesitate to say this , but we should ” stand up ” in protest about the unsolicited crap these people post. It’s not just the pruduct per se; it is this particular product’s subliminal implicit message that irks.

Rate This: 0 0

By: Psimon

Psimon — Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:44:30 +0000

You know, I really HATE these @#*!’s that post their adverts on bulletin boards like that.

I’d much rather they came round my house.

Then I could explain to them why not to do it.

As painfully as I can make it.

Literally.

Rate This: 0 0

By: Jack Ramsey

Jack Ramsey — Mon, 24 Oct 2005 10:26:22 +0000

I’ve just had a belated read of the above. As far as I can see cannabis should be legalised because as soon as it becomes a legal business then it will have to cope with taxation, antidiscrimination rules, maternity and paternity leave. Dealers living at the top of Victorian terraced houses will have to provide lifts. Any one sufferring ill effects will be able to sue. Unable to cope the dope industry will go the way of so many other small businesses.

Next – legalise murder with appropriate health and safety and quality standards. Zero tolerance – phooey!

Rate This: 0 0

By: Sean O'Regan

Sean O'Regan — Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:51:22 +0000

My view on paternity leave is that it would be far more appropriate to schedule it in for when the child reaches 13. During the early months most fathers are clueless, whereas fortunately most mothers instinctively know what to do. It’s in later years that the child really appreciates the extra dimension a father can bring and if paternity leave during summer holidays for fathers of teenagers is an incentive to keep couples together then I’m all for it.

Rate This: 0 0

By: Melissa

Melissa — Fri, 21 Oct 2005 21:53:03 +0000

Richard Shepherd – am totally with you on the “we must move on” sentiment.

I also hope that the membership will get a say on the voting for new leader, as I’m sure we will.

Rate This: 0 0

By: Richard Shepherd

Richard Shepherd — Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:13:35 +0000

I am not ashamed to say that I wanted Ken Clarke but we must accept it and move on. The big question now is whether we, the members, will actually get a vote in this thing. Clearly I should learn to manage my expectations a little better but Michael Howard was a shoe-in and now we are threatened by another. Do the members matter or should we just be grateful? If the MP’s do another ‘deal’ then what are we all here for exactly? Strawberry Teas and putting on a posh accent when the MP walks in? I think I’ll set up a support group for disenfranchised members. I will call it the TA – Tories Anonymous. Fingers crossed for a choice after all – please. Come on Boris do a bit of tactical voting to give the membership something to do.

Rate This: 0 0

By: @/Gracie

@/Gracie — Wed, 19 Oct 2005 10:23:30 +0000

Hi Merkin

Am taking up your challenge mate.

1st question: they are in the same gang

2nd: I’m sure they have been at many bashes

3rd: Cameron’s best friend is Osborne so HE must be the anointed one

Keep interrogating Merkin!

Rate This: 0 0

By: The Merkin

The Merkin — Tue, 18 Oct 2005 21:29:33 +0000

Boris

Would you be supporting David Cameron if you weren’t in the Bullingdon together? Was a drunken white tie bash in The Elizabeth the Tory equivalent of the Blair-Brown Granita meeting? Are YOU his anointed successor?

@ – go on, ask the boss these questions, won’t you? I’m dying to hear his answers!

kisses

Merkin
x

Rate This: 0 0

By: jaq

jaq — Tue, 18 Oct 2005 18:36:30 +0000

Try to start a fight with a single mother with PMT – not a good argument really UNLESS YOU WANT OPPRESSING TOO!! (giggles)

Rate This: 0 0